A Very Different Winning Essay

It occurred to me that the tone of the winning essay of the PAFPNet competition in the previous post is highly pro-Pacific culture, which is necessary and laudable, but can appear to imply, perhaps without intending to, that agriculture is culturally and functionally anathema to the use of technology.  For instance: “Agriculture is not an occupation that comes with a desk, PC, and a comfortable fallback chair. No, Agriculture is so much better than this, it comes with a connection, to our ancestors, to the earth, and most importantly, and too often overlooked, to the very core of human survival – eating”.

However surely it is possible and indeed necessary to perpetuate Pacific culture using information and communication technology; moreover it may even be true that future Pacific food security depends on technological and scientific advance, including progress in ICT.

Thus I want to post in full the very different, very pro-modern winning essay of another competition run by the Agriculture, Rural Development and Youth in the Information Society, run by the EU think tank CTA, along with other partners including LRD’s PAFPNet.  This competition was about agriculture and ICT across the ACP (Africa, Caribbean and the Pacific regions) and a Fijian writer, Riten Gosai, aged 21, was among the competition winners.  Links to the winning essays can be found here.

Personally I believe we have to combine the two approaches, the technocratic approach with the approach that understands and perpetuates that which can motivate Pacific youth to go into agriculture in the first place.  Here is Riten Gosai’s essay.

“The use of information and communication technology to address information poverty and reluctance of farmers to commercialise in the Fiji Islands

Fiji lies in the heart of the Pacific Ocean midway between the Equator and the South Pole. The country’s Exclusive Economic Zone contains 330 islands, a third of which are inhabited and covers approximately 1.3 million square kilometers of the South Pacific Ocean. Fiji has a land area of 18,333 square kilometers of which 16 percent is arable agricultural land. The country encounters a maritime tropical climate without great extremes of heat or cold (Fiji Bureau of Statistics, 2008, p.3). Agriculture continues to be the bedrock of the Fijian economy, accounting in 2007 for 14 percent of Fiji’s gross domestic product (GDP) and two-thirds of its near 320,000 strong workforce. Sugar, the most important agricultural product, generated almost 30 percent of agricultural GDP. However, the commercial future of this industry depends on the resolution of the land ownership system due to which cultivation and production continue to decline drastically. Consequently, agricultural focus has now shifted towards diversifying into high-value cash crops for the domestic market, the prosperous tourism industry and also exports (Agriculture Strategic Development Plan 2010 – 2012, 2009, p. 5).

The growing demand for agricultural commodities including higher quality products offers opportunities for improving the livelihoods of the rural communities (Stienen et al, 2007, p. 2). The role of information and communication technologies, ‘ICTs’, to enhance food security is increasingly being recognized and was officially endorsed at the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) 2003- 2005. ‘Information and communication technology’ includes any communication device or application encompassing cellular phones, computer and internet hardware and software, satellite and geographical information systems, as well as various services associated with them, such as video conferencing (Techtarget, 2010). This essay will discuss how ICTs can be used to counter ‘information poverty’ and unwillingness of farmers to commercialize in Fiji.

To begin with, successful farming naturally depends on the availability of resources- amongst many tangible resources; information is the intangible resource (Heeks R and Ducombe R, 2001, p. 1). Without good quality agricultural information, bad decisions are made. This is true everywhere in the world but is a major problem in developing countries including Fiji which is extremely information poor. As a result, farmers are significantly affected. Heeks and Ducombe (2001) also entail that the direct effect of such inconsistency is the waste of money, time and loss of income. Information poverty makes farm entrepreneurs isolated, uncertain and risk prone. If received information is complete, accurate, relevant, timely and appropriately presented, it results in cost reduction and increased income.

Kiplang’at (1999) proposes that dissemination of relevant information to the farming communities can facilitate the effective adoption of agricultural inputs, decision making on markets and adoption of scientific methods. Conversely, the lack of distribution of information across the agricultural supply chain is a major concern for Fiji farmers. ICTs provide the essential link in bridging this information gap. In Fiji, a challenge exists whereby the agriculture sector has failed to take advantage of such technology to deliver resourceful information to needy farmers. This predicament could be addressed should the agriculture ministry and concerned organizations adopt a bottom-up approach for introducing ICT enabled projects in accordance with the needs and cultures of the rural populace as suggested by Dey et al (n.d.).

Firstly, the use of mobile phones is extremely widespread in Fiji. Vodafone, Fiji’s first mobile company has over 90 percent coverage and 700,000 customers (Vodafone Fiji, 2010). Digicel, another mobile network has over 70 percent coverage (Digicel Fiji, 2010). Agricultural information could be spread at a massive scale should software be developed to support the farmers via mobile phones. Ilahiane (2007) stated that mobile phones have revolutionized the way in which farmer’s access, exchange and manipulate information. Mobile technology can be harnessed for great benefits to Fiji farmers. For example, a network of community workers in Uganda uses a suite of mobile applications to give farming advice (Gantt and Cantor, 2010, p. 4). Similarly, a DatAgro project in Chile takes advantage of the high penetration rate of mobile phones to allow rural farming cooperatives to define the types of information most critical to their livelihoods and receive it via text messages (Cagley, 2010, p. 8-9).

Secondly, village ‘telecentres’ can be extremely successful in transmitting information. Rural telecentres can be equipped with computers and internet and use solar power for energy as in Kenya where a computer centre was established for farmers with 4 inveneo solar-powered computers, two 80 watt solar panels and a small modem (Kigoni, 2009, p. 16-17). Useful agricultural information on the web can also be accessed via mobile phones that support internet connection. Vodafone and Digicel Fiji also boast their highly successful ‘flashnet’- ‘usb’ powered internet which can be accessed anywhere mobile coverage is available. Video conferencing with farmers via satellites or over the internet to deliver urgently required information is also an innovative use of ICT. This also enables demonstrations to be made without actually being present in remote areas (Gakuru et al, 2009, p. 14).

Additionally, traditional electronic media, such as radio and television which have greater than 80 percent coverage over Fiji (Communication Fiji Limited, 2010) could be used to broadcast quality programs then existing to really impact the agricultural populace. Communications Fiji Limited and Fiji Broadcasting Company Limited have six multilingual radio stations each while two free-to-air television companies (Fiji Television Limited and Mai Television) also exist. The potential for Fiji farmers to receive relevant information at the appropriate time is immense. However, a model is needed that implements farmer’s feedback, a resource that can be used to further enhance information delivery.

The next challenge confronting agricultural development in Fiji is the fear and unwillingness of farmers to commercialize production, hence causing them to be trapped in a vicious cycle of poverty. Majority of the 86, 680 rural households (54 percent of the Fiji population) are engaged in subsistence agricultural or fishing activities (Agriculture Strategic Development Plan 2010- 2012, 2009, pp. 9). Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) sub-regional Representative for the Pacific Islands, Fuavao, V (2010) stated that “a thriving agriculture sector is crucial to address food security and poverty. A healthy sector creates more jobs, income and food for the poor. The challenge is creating a healthy agricultural sector to achieve these objectives and the key is commercialization”. Correspondingly, in the Agriculture Strategic Development Plan for 2010 to 2012, the Fiji government aims to reduce import bill of rice, potatoes, dairy products, sheep and beef to $FJD105 million by 2012 and to attain a greater level of self-sufficiency. In addition to that, another goal is to increase value of exports for non-sugar crops by $FJD100 million by 2012.

First of all, increasing the efficiency, productivity and sustainability of small scale farms is an area where ICT can make a significant contribution. Key improvements stem from information about pests and disease control, early warning systems, quality control, agro-meteorological services, agro-technology transfer and what is being done around the world (McNamara, 2009). Climate change is a major threat to Pacific food security. New techniques to optimize production are being developed which need to be conveyed to the farmers. For instance, after researchers in Burkina Faso identified the best crop varieties for the Sissili region, the Federation of Farmer Organization of Sissili, intensively used digital photos, video camera and video presentations to explain the new growing techniques, hence production increased by nine folds (Lenoir, 2009, p. 4-5). Similarly, the OSCAR (open source simple computer for agriculture rural areas) project in 2006 developed a software program to identify weeds using photographed images. It then provides the weed description, variety and control methods (Lie and Balasubramaniam, 2006, pp. 29). Such technology can be highly utilized in a country like Fiji where expert and skilled personnel are limited.

Secondly, up to date market information can have a dramatic impact on farmer’s negotiating position in the commercial sector (Stienin et al, 2007, p. 3). Simple websites to match offer and demand of agro-produce are a start of a more complex agriculture trade system; something which is absent in domestic agricultural trade. An example is the “EChoupal” program in India which operates a kiosk with internet access in the house of a trained farmer within walking distance of target farmers with objective of creating a direct marketing channel for the area’s farmers (Sharma, 2007, p. 6). Likewise, the Pacific island of Vanuatu became the second country in the world to operate the National Livestock Identification System (NLIS), the Australian tracking system for cattle to trace its organic beef that is compatible with European Union market requirements (James, 2006, p. 7).

Furthermore, ICTs are extremely important for stock and quality control in large scale production. When bar-coded information is scanned into computers, it details the movement of commodities. An illustration of quality control is displayed by the Malian Fruit and Vegetable Export Organization. It uses digital cameras and the internet to gather data from farmers to meet international export standards and then makes the same information available on the web (Senmartin, 2009, 10-11). Moreover, ICTs in commercial agriculture aid in credit access and control, personnel management, finance and communication.

A relatively new technology for Fiji is the ‘global positioning system’ or ‘GPS’ that can be a crucial support to agriculture commercialization as it was used in Ethiopia to map rural roads. This helps non-governmental organizations, extension services and farmers to plan their transportation needs (ICT Update 2010, p.7). GPS positioning is also used to provide guidance in the field and record information. It can be used to set and document jobs as well as record boundaries and features on the farm through mapping. Information can also be exported to office software for traceability and analysis (ICT for Farming, 2010).

In conclusion then, the prevalence of challenges to agriculture in Fiji is being increasingly recognized; hence the employment of ICTs to address these issues is essential. However, this will depend on many factors including community ownership, appropriate content, building on existing practices, access and empowerment, strengthening partnerships and on cost and financial sustainability (O’Farell, n.d.). All in all, ICTs need to be adopted and incorporated into the livelihoods of Fiji farmers to enhance their knowledge and intelligence as well as equip them to farm on a commercial scale for the improvement of their own lives, betterment of their communities and the nation as a whole.”

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agriculture Strategic Development Plan 2010 – 2012, 2009, Department of Agriculture, Suva, Fiji.

Cagley, M 2010, ‘Direct Data on Demand’, ICT Updates, issue 53, pp. 8-9.

Communications Fiji Limited 2010. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://www.cfl.com.fj/aboutus.php

Dey, B, Prondergast, R & Neuman, D, n.d., How can ICTs be used and appropriated to address agricultural information needs of Bangladeshi farmers.

Digicel Fiji 2010. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://www.digicelfiji.com/en/about/news/digicel_annouces_expansion_of_network_coverage

Fiji Broadcasting Company Limited 2010. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://www.radiofiji.com.fj/aboutus.php

Fiji Facts and Figures as at 1st July 2008, Fiji Islands Bureau of Statistics, 5th Floor Ratu Sukuna House, McArthur Street, Suva.

Fuavau, V 2010 ‘Pacific Island Food and Agriculture Problems’, Press release of the Pacific Food Summit 2010. Retrieved 20 July, 2010, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1004/S00378/pacfic-island-food-and-agriculture-problem.htm

Gantt, W and Carter, E 2010, ‘Direct Data on Demand’, ICT Updates, issue 53, pp. 4.

Heeks, R & Duncombe, R 2001, Information Technology and Small Enterprises- A Handbook for Enterprise Support Agencies in Developing Countries, Version 1. IDPM, University of Manchester, UK.

ICT for farming, 2010. Retrieved July 20, 2010, from http://www.actnowcornwall.co.uk/ICTfor Agriculture.asp

Ilahiane, H 2007, Impacts of ICTs on agriculture: Farmers and Mobile Phones. Retrieved July 20, 2010, from http://www.public.iastate.edu/-hsain/Research/Impacts%20of%20ICT%20in%20agriculture%20Ilahiane.ppt

James, J 2010, ‘Making the Switch’, ICT Updates, issue 32, pp. 7.

Kigani, C 2010, ‘When Persistence Pays Off’, ICT Updates, issue 50, pp. 16-17.

Kiplang’at, J 1999, An analysis of the opportunities for information technology in improving access, transfer and the use of agricultural information in the rural areas in Kenya. Library Management, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 115- 117.

Lenoir, M 2010, ‘Farmers Teaching Farmers’, ICT Updates, issue 52, pp. 4-5.

Lie, R 2006. ‘An Exercise in ICT, agriculture and society’, Department of Communication Science, Wageningen University,The Netherlands. Retrieved July 21, 2010, from http://www.ifpindia.org/ecrire/…/i4d_july_oscar%20article_29-30.pdf

McNamara, K 2009, Mobile Application in Agriculture and Development- Framing the topic and learning from Experiences. School of Communication, American University, Washington DC.

O’Farell, C n.d. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for Agriculture and Rural Development in the Caribbean Region. Extension, Education and Communication Service, Fod and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

On the Right Road 2010, ICT Updates, issue 54, pp. 7.

Senmartin, D 2010, ‘Exporting Information’, ICT Updates, issue 47, pp. 10-11.

Sharma, S 2007. Role of ICT in Rural Commerce and Agricultural Extension. ITC International Business Division, pp. 6.

Stienen, J, Bruinsma, W & Neuman, F 2007, ‘How ICTs can make a difference in agricultural livelihoods’, Internation Institute for Communication and Development, P.O. Box 11586, 2502, AN, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Subramanium, D 2006. ‘An Exercise in ICT, agriculture and society’, Manager Information Systems, French Institute of Pondicherry, India.  Retrieved July 21, 2010, from http://www.ifpindia.org/ecrire/…/i4d_july_oscar%20article_29-30.pdf

Techtarget 2010. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://searchio-midmarket.techtarget.com/sDefinition/O,,sid183_gci928405,00.html

Vodafone Fiji 2010. Retrieved July 22, 2010, from http://www.vodafone.com.fj/pages.cfm/general/about_us/vodafone_fiji/

Advertisements

One response to “A Very Different Winning Essay

  1. Mr Editor,

    Thanks for the prompting to inform your readers.

    Farmers and stakeholders like yourselves can now utilize the purpose-created website: http://www.Fiji-Taro-And-Kava.com, to amass supply figures (by crop), introduce professional advice from SPC/LRD, government, etc, and direct marketing with customers.

    Farmer Input via online forms on provincial pages, traders maximize scheduling with precise harvest schedules (RSS) and marketers with the support of processors are better able to sell – with varying customer incentives.

    Here’s the site for the above. What’s left is for:
    1. Tikina/District Councils to form (crop) associations to begin managing matters, like being responsible for updating website of regional data and content. This wired computer can be part of a national budget from central government.

    2. Professional Input from MPI, SPC/LRD, academia, industry advising matters, crop specifics, etc.

    While I have marketed successfully with prepaid orders, I feel we could all do a better job together sharing readily available information to manage the process of a market oriented agriculture approach.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s